Situational diagnosis of the Institutional Research Ethics Committees in Social Security in Peru

Authors

  • Percy Herrera-Añazco Médico Nefrólogo
  • Diego Urrunaga-Pastor Médico Cirujano
  • Suly Soto-Ordoñez Licenciada en Enfermería
  • Virgilio E. Failoc-Rojas Médico Cirujano
  • Maggie Estrada-Martínez Cirujano Dentista
  • Agueda Muñoz Del Carpio Toia Médico Cirujano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2022.151.1057

Keywords:

Ethics, Research, Research Design, Clinical Trials as Topic

Abstract

Background: Although the Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías e Investigaciones en Salud (IETSI) has promoted the formation of Institutional Research Ethics Committees (IRECs) in the social security of Peru (EsSalud), there may be perfectible aspects. The characteristics of the IREC of EsSalud and its members during 2021 are described. Material and Methods: A descriptive and observational study was carried out using a secondary database. IREC members were surveyed using a virtual form created by IETSI. 114 members belonging to 18 EsSalud networks were included. Results: 52.6% of the participants were male, the mean age was 50.6 ± 11.9 years, and 42.1% had a scientific role. In 38.8% of the IREC were evaluated more than five clinical trials in the last two years and 72.2% more than five observational studies in the same period. The members reported limitations for holding virtual meetings or supervisions, lack of time to carry out their tasks due to the high workload and the need for training on research methodology and biostatistics. Conclusion: it is necessary to improve the administrative support and the training plan for the members of the IREC of EsSalud, to achieve methodological, ethical, and regulatory competencies that ensure an improvement in the processes of evaluation and ethical monitoring of human research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Percy Herrera-Añazco, Médico Nefrólogo

1. Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud. Lima, Perú.
2. Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú.

Diego Urrunaga-Pastor, Médico Cirujano

1. Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud. Lima, Perú.
2. Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú.

Suly Soto-Ordoñez, Licenciada en Enfermería

1. Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud. Lima, Perú.

Virgilio E. Failoc-Rojas, Médico Cirujano

1. Unidad de Investigación para Generación y Síntesis de Evidencia en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.

Maggie Estrada-Martínez, Cirujano Dentista

1. Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud. Lima, Perú.

Agueda Muñoz Del Carpio Toia, Médico Cirujano

1. Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Católica Santa María, Arequipa, Perú.

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Herrera-Añazco P, Urrunaga-Pastor D, Soto-Ordoñez S, Failoc-Rojas VE, Estrada-Martínez M, Muñoz Del Carpio Toia A. Situational diagnosis of the Institutional Research Ethics Committees in Social Security in Peru. Rev. Cuerpo Med. HNAAA [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 May 10];15(1):53-9. Available from: http://www.cmhnaaa.org.pe/ojs/index.php/rcmhnaaa/article/view/1057

Issue

Section

Original Article

Categories

Recommended Articles

1 2 3 > >>